[Preprod test] Marketing Events RFP 2027 bid ranking

Informational tally

A reading of the counted responses, not an official result. How this is counted and what it leaves out

1. Question 1

   Rank the four bids for the 2027 marketing events programme, most preferred first. The bid ranked first by the tally rule becomes the vendor eligible to receive the withdrawn funds.

   Rank 1 to 4

   • Bid 1: Helios Event Group (9.8M ada, 12 events)0 ₳0 first preferences
   • Bid 2: Northwind Collective (10.0M ada, 8 events)0 ₳0 first preferences
   • Bid 3: Kestrel Media House (7.4M ada, 9 events)0 ₳0 first preferences
   • Bid 4: Bluefin Live (10.0M ada, 15 events)435.6 ₳1 first preference

   Bars are sized against the leading option. They compare the options, they are not shares of anything.

   1 counted response answered this question, none left it out.

2. Question 2

   Which of these bids do you consider fundable at all? Selecting none is a valid answer and means no bid should be funded.

   Select 0 to 4

   • Bid 1: Helios Event Group (9.8M ada, 12 events)0 ₳0 responders
   • Bid 2: Northwind Collective (10.0M ada, 8 events)435.6 ₳1 responder
   • Bid 3: Kestrel Media House (7.4M ada, 9 events)0 ₳0 responders
   • Bid 4: Bluefin Live (10.0M ada, 15 events)0 ₳0 responders

   Bars are sized against the leading option. They compare the options, they are not shares of anything.

   1 counted response answered this question, none left it out.

1 of 1 counted response could be matched to a DRep with a known voting power · power as of epoch 317

Other roles answered this survey too: stakeholders (1). Those responses are outside every figure above, which counts DRep responses only.

Reading computed 1d ago.